SoulHunter (DayZ)

you're* 8 months is actually a very good amount of time to make a game. Buying human-beings? Lol wut?

Big Apple for the win.

Next time try "scheisse" then =)

I dont play in the servers where there are dozens of biplanes, tanks, nukes and whatnot. First learn to spell "schiesse" ;) Seriously.. What is that ?

He said that his idea was meant to be bubbles that are visible thru objects and whatnot. So we would see bubbles everywhere. Someone would lay down as you try to aim to shoot someone else and he would then write something. A magical bubble would pop up and block your view so the enemy could flee. There could be dozens of such example made up easily considering the case is about bubbles that are visible no matter whats in front of it..

Why do you feel the need having the opportunity to communicate with everyone on the world instantly in an apocalypse whenever desired? It makes the game somehow more immersive?

That is indeed a fact that less ammo would cause less PvP. However, there should be almost no ammo for it to happen. If you would have ten bullets, you could still spend 2-3 of them attempting to kill someone who you think could also have some bullets. But if you would only have 3-4 bullets like the rest of the people in the server, you would not really attempt to risk wasting any of them and keep them for important things instead. I however think that, as much as I could see from the devblogs, there will be indeed bullets. Maybe not as many as in the mod but enough to get into a firefight, which is fair enough for people to go for some PvP action.

No, you said that the project will most likely be canceled/abandoned due to economical reasons that BIS will face based on your extensive experience/knowledge. As I mentioned before, that is the reason why the first and only release date has been missed. It was not going to be the "DayZ StandAlone" we expect now. How do you know that? They did show nothing but posts that say "bug fixes again.. all day bug fixes.. together bug fixes.. BUG FIXES" Ah.. sorry. I forgot that you have access to the pre-alpha version of the game. You said something and now you are saying different things about the possible future of this game.. Are you sure that you know what you think you are sure you know? Dang it.. You got it buddy.. We seem to have failed to hide that.. This game will never be released.. You can go and play another game in peace now. No. You are not the one who has seen enough to make such assumptions that dont even have a base. One of those who have seen enough was here and commented on your subject saying;

It was not a failed release.. It was meant to be the game version which was planned to be the exact of the mod, which is why they decided to cancel it and instead of which they wanted to take the opportunity to make a new game totally.

KoS means "Killing on Sight" which stands for "Killing on Sight", which literally means "Killing on Sight". Plain and simple. Don't try to make it look more complicated. It is in english. It stands for shooting anything that moves around. Yes, what most people think is right. No, KoS's definition is obviously not even a bit different.

I did not say that it is a survival game as planed. I said that it is meant to be a survival game, which does not mean that I am not aware of everyone being bandits nowadays (for a while now). I would agree that there is nothing much to do if one does not know what to do with a clan or friends.. But those who find something to do other than PvP, imo enjoy far more than those who just seek PvP. And sir, there is a big difference between KoS and being a bandit. Imo acting as a bandit is also sometimes so much fun, hell even in RP servers there are a lot of bandits, which is imo a part of the game.

I am not a butthurt (cus I generally die with normal ways instead of getting KoSed), but I also say so. Therefore that speculation of yours is invalid. The sentences that are colored blue are no near being about "KoS (Killing On Sight)". KoS players do not do such. What is colored with red stands against survival gaming, but as you clearly stated for "PvP gaming", which is "no" to that the game is more fun like that, because it is not designed to be such an experience in the first place. It is meant to be a survival zombie MMO, which the ones who you think are butthurt think and support.

Are you sure that you understood my post clearly? -.-

When side-chat is allowed (thx to reddit for the vid)

Side chat being got away would make the game boring.. May I ask in how many servers you saw people constantly talk in side-chat? How often do you use it in personal? Just being curious..

that now makes more sense. a "chatbox" would solve the having-disadvanges issue, which I think rocket would not like to let happen considering him being the one against the chatbox due to immersion purposes..

Nice idea, but that would imo cause a disadvantage for those who use headsets. If you would talk via mic, enemies around would probably hear it as well.. If you would write something and what you write would pop up as a text above your character and if your char is between tight woodeds or sorta, no one other than you and the one you mean to talk would know what you write. The texts that are written will be visible through the objects and environments ?

Did you manage to clean the second level so far? My gas never made it up until me being able to find a chance to do that. Did you play only in the first level? Its pretty tough buddy.. What players can do is limited due to the gas you have (unless there is a way to re-fill the gas in the game which I am prob not aware of.) Yeh seems like so.. I cant believe someone could go full liar/retard just in order to be able to seem like the right side in a BSish mess like this.. The second report seems also promising tho hehe (:

Ah.. Alrgiht.. Lets drop the weird mess here and lets get On-Topic again if the total confusion got calmed a little. Everyone seems to speak english here, therefore it is weird for someone to mis-understand others here. On-Topic:I'm looking forward to see what will happen soon =) Btw.. Anyone noticed so far that "Supa Sand" yet made another video reporting the abuse of another admin? x) This time, OverWatch seems to be the home of the abuse.. =) *eats popcorn*

Who did ? Who is he ? I guess I am missing the point of the Off-Topic mess here.

No one said that they are connected, stop it.

I cant agree more with whats written up there. But afaik ArmA 3 uses Real Virtuality 4 engine ? There is imo still big differences between VR1 AND VR4.. Even between VR3 and VR4 based on the wiki of Bohemia Interactive;

He is saying "over reacting". What does that mean? Lemme answer that for you.. It means that there was an issue to react in the first place, but he thinks he might have taken it "A BIT" more seriously than it was supposed to be. If there was an issue to react, it was himself in the first place. His reaction should have been to write a wall of text here apologizing and elaborating why he felt the need to threat and why it was so wrong and due to which such an action would not repeat again. Nah sir.. It was not an "Over-Reacting" by anyway. It was a "Mis-Reacting". He says:"Your video and the strike will be removed right away.." He says:"Your video" "YOUR VIDEO" It was already blocked. However the guy still sees himself as the right side so far.. What he did with youtube was a total of BS, faking the facts and making up another BS to take the video down.. Now he sees that he will be the one who may fall due to the illegal action he decided to take (his second call, which is also wrong and not wise to do), which gives the victim another reason why there must be an action taken against that little retarded spoiled kid who thinks he can do whatever he wants even though what he does may be considered as "illegal" and out of ethics of being a human. PS:Btw what you wrote up there made me believe more that you guys are somehow connected.. But meh, just an assumption of an ordinary person tho..