lipemr

they why did they make it first person only if the first person camera isnt more realistic/balanced/hard to play on?

of course, so it means that every non english speaking country out there is made of retards, and shouldnt be able to play the game, right? LOL could you please, respond to the questions of this page here? http://www.testesdeqi.com.br/testes/idiomas/teste-de-portugues/ it's the exact same thing. shitty logic is shitty.

chill, they're just antisocial losers whose life is so bad they need to use a game to win something. that's older in online games than walking forward, it wouldnt happen so much on the mod cause the amount of children/immature people playing would be much smaller. they more than likely get bullied as hell on school and need to release their frustration somewhere.

i try to tell myself that it isnt the case and that attachments are probably just leftover from another pistol model that they used to make the new one. But i'm getting pretty sure that you're right.

ammo shouldnt be scarce, as most militaries around the world use m2's or another .50BMG anti vehicle machinegun. Although the maintenance should be a pain in the ass, as HMG rounds have much more loose industrial thresholds than match grade ammo that these rifles are supposed to use. So carrying a AM rifle major drawbacks should be dumping your stamina by a great deal, having to maintain a LOT to avoid jammings and misfires, and the recoil should make impossible to shoot the weapon of not prone/supported. And i'm still up to the idea that if the would add an anti materiel rifle, it should be the m99, isnt common at all but it would have a much more balanced role in the game than a m82 or m107 would have.

ooh dear, if they make this pistol supressed i'll reconsider my concepts about how realism is relevant in this game. i really hope the devs wont shoot their own feet and start using a COD-like logic behind attachments.

they're not crimpled half dead zombies, they're infected with a virus that induces a frenzy, making them immune to pain and probably more strong than any human would be. They dont feel pain nor get tired, they should actually outrun you and 2~3 hit know you out. Obviously making them that strong while they're bugged as they're in game right now would be a imense pain in the ass that would only make people stop playing after getting killed from behind a wall multiple times. Though i agree with you that the respawning mechanics right now are even more flawed than the one we had in the mod. And seems that the human detection range on zombies is faded to be buggy, must be somthing with the engine.

you know that i play the game, even tho you insist to come up with this "you didnt even buy the game" bullshit. I'm sure you're helping a lot by blinding yourself and telling everybody that's everything okay with the game, even when each day there's more people reporting issues with cheaters. :rolleyes: i just cant take you seriously, bro. Just keep on 'helping the developent' by going into denial and be happy in your happy world.

of course, there's only one hacker in the entire fucking hundreds of thousands of daily players of this game. A brief look at the most famous cheat site dayz subforum will tell you how much i'm "close minded" compared to you. Some people just like to live in a bubble out of reality, jesus christ. to illustrate the amount of people that search for these cheats (that is from their free section, so is likely that only the outdated shit will be posted there)

i'm sure dayz was the jackpot for BIS, they wont ever do a game sell like it again, not they have resources to compete with the AAA game industry. I dont see why they would invest in dayz just to boost their company credibility only to go bankrupt/get back to the pre-dayz state 4 years later. It's down to waiting, after all, let's place our bets and not be dicks nor ignorants to the facts like some people here on the forums are.

this People have way too much faith in BI, they probably made more money with the dayz early access than they did with all of their other titles all together, the chance of them releasing another game that makes that much money is pretty much non existant. I wouldnt be surprised if they made standalone die out by slowing the development speed till people get tired of this genre and move on, hence why i get so pissed af fanboys defending them at all costs. Bohemia is a company, companies main objective is to earn money, bohemia already made probably all the money they will do in their lifetime, it would be much more smarter to them to get out of the game while they're with a ton of money than would be to invest effort and money in a game that already gave all the profit it could give. It's just logic behind a economy point of view. You cant expect them to waste their money on a potentially 'flawed from the start' game just for their fans, that's not how it works. BIS will probably invest the least money possible in the game from now on, just enough so the major chunk of the playerbase dont freak out and boycott their future projects. That's the more logical thing to do from the economical point of view.

i'm trying my best, cant blame me for not grasping stupidity after almost 20 posts of useless discussion.

people like me and him wont even care anymore then, maybe we will only get here to tell you a big "i told you" and laugh a bit off the fanboys that defended this title with all their resources. That's a big maybe, though. I seriously expect that they'll prove me wrong and this game turn out to be the golden release of the decade, but i'm pretty sure that's not gonna happen.

well, cant blame people for wanting fair and balanced pvp. The 3rd person view isnt fair even when everyone uses it, as in most times people see you and you cant see them, even if you use the 3rd camera. isnt even about the 'threat level', it's more about the bullshit'o'meter. It's not fun, realistic nor fair when a jackass appears from behind cover with his weapon already aimed at your direction and instantly kills you, even when he was completely out of your possible sight all the time before that.

dont even start an argument with this guy, you'll lose your time, believe me. Doesnt matter what you say on these forums, people will just tell you to stfu and wait, and apparently everything is a placeholder to the final goal, bad thing is that instead of developing the final product, they keep fiddling with these placeholders and constantly fucking things up. Be glad no one yelled alpher or pasted the disclaimer at you, as they usually do.

you're not? so you're trying to prove my opinion is wrong and yours is true? and you're not trying to shove your opinion down my throat? FFS, you really have some problems, friend. You're right and i'm wrong, now go tell your friends that you wont an argument in the internetz and leave me in peace, please, i'm just tired of your nonsense talk.

well, i guess the civilian market is much more subjective to add to the equation, as it's supposed that the main source of modern weapons in chernarus would be the military that went there after the outbreak. they could be present, but would be rare as hell, i dont even see the point in adding them looking from this point of view.

well, i'm from brazil and ALL of their production goes only to civilian market, taurus manufacture it here and exports to USA and other countries. If you search a bit, you'll see that there's only 2 or 3 countries that issued tavors for their troops. BTW, Tavors didnt pass Brazillian army's testings against the IA2 (modernized FAL manufactured bt IMBEL)

you realize that you're doing the exact same thing, right? or dont you have the necessary IQ to get it? Again: Fuck off, i dont want to argue with you.

uzis and p90's would be present, the last one only on crash sites, tho. UZIs are all over the damn world man. And i think he didnt add AKs just cause they're already confirmed on the game.

oh, i see your point. I guess i would choose the m82 (is it the bolt action?) or the m99 variant over the m107, for balancing matters, preferably the m99, as it is single shot, no overpowered 1200m semi auto shooters like the mod, heh. Though i would still choose the g36 over the l85, as it is adopted by much more countries than the last one, but probably both would be present on a scenario like chernarus. And the tavor isnt adopted by much countries military AFAIK, i guess they're more famous on the civilian market.

seriously? So you dont even know how to use a forum and you're trying to get this smartass talk over me? "duh, you're wrong cause you're wrong, you posted before me, but as i didnt read it in time, your argument is invalid" fuck off dude, seriously.

Tac-50? AW50? L85? wtf? a m107 would be more common than the first two, and british troops didnt act on chernarus in any part of its history, why would l85's be there? Even tavors wouldnt be viable. I think SIGs and g36's would be much more common than the last two.

what? so now they're starting to ban people that say bad things about the game? You know, this remembers me some game's forum, you know. That game that has a Z on the end too, they started to ban everyone that would post something negative about the game too, and i remember all the DayZ crowd used it as a joke here on this forums. This is just... ironic. Well, i guess my days are coming to an end too. LOL

Well, the problem isnt HOW, the problem is WHEN. How long it will be till zombies can be a threat without being walking glitches that spawn over your head? Arent them the main threat of the 'zombie apocalipse' premise?